Engine seals on some motors are easier to do with the front cover off, maybe that's why?Why would he or anybody take off the aux shaft cover to change the timing belt? That is the part that has me confused..
Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here
Thank you for being a part of our community!
Engine seals on some motors are easier to do with the front cover off, maybe that's why?Why would he or anybody take off the aux shaft cover to change the timing belt? That is the part that has me confused..
I dunno. It's basically middle of nowhere farm land. The guy was totally decent to communicate with and everything. I just get the sense that, if it ain't Ford or Chevy, it's exotic to them. I'll see what's going on once I have it all apart in my driveway.
My educated guess about what happened:
The mechanic couldn’t be bothered ordering and waiting for the 1378493 oil seal flange gasket. So he substituted it with a liquid gasket.
This means the inside of the seal flange made contact with the auxiliary shaft outer, which is why it seized and broke the cam belt.
Yeh. I'm extra not thrilled about this part.Then the breaker bar was used on the shaft to get it to unseize. This is yellow flag number two for me.
Meaning that, while not a guarantee, the overwhelming likelihood is that, if the oil pump seized. The intermediate shaft would still turn. Is that correct?It is possible to lock the intermediate shaft up with a seized oil pump. I know that the oil pump normally shears the drive but there were sleeves available for a long time.
I have seen this failure mode exactly one time in a bazillion b230s that I've had my paws on.
Meaning that, while not a guarantee, the overwhelming likelihood is that, if the oil pump seized. The intermediate shaft would still turn. Is that correct?
The belt snapped first, that's the reason I had it towed to the shop.
I've since confirmed with the mechanic that he pulled the cover and sealed it with RTV. So I think the belt walked off the gears because I mixed up the cam and intermediate gears. I brought it to the shop and asked him to put on new seals and a belt (I'm assuming the oil everywhere is a result of me screwing up the seals, though I have no idea how I'd've done that). Instead of just pulling the seals and putting in new ones, he pulled the cover, then reinstalled it with RTV, seizing the intermediate shaft. Then he went to install the belt, couldn't turn the intermediate shaft to get it timed right. At this point he called me and told me I had bent valves.
Yeh. I'm extra not thrilled about this part.
Sometimes folks remove the cover to replace the seals.Why would he or anybody take off the aux shaft cover to change the timing belt? That is the part that has me confused..
Me neither, until now. Apparently they're only different on the roundtooth cars, in that the cam gear has the spacer built in to it. So that means you could use 16valve roundtooth gears without issue as long as you kept the original spacer.I didn't know the cam and the aux shaft gears were different.
Me neither, until now. Apparently they're only different on the roundtooth cars, in that the cam gear has the spacer built in to it. So that means you could use 16valve roundtooth gears without issue as long as you kept the original spacer.
Well, I finally got the car back home and had a few minutes to dig in. Here's what I've found so far: