Impressive numbers.....
Done any 0-60 or 1/4 miles runs on it yet?
The car is pretty traction limited to say the least
This car is a beast!
Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here
Thank you for being a part of our community!
Impressive numbers.....
Done any 0-60 or 1/4 miles runs on it yet?
nice numbers felix.
insane torque numbers. why so much?
3rd gear dyno
in b4 bent rods
I ask myself the same thing
Just to toss somethings out there, e85 has a greater flame speed. On top of that, you need more of it.
Keeping the above in mind, do you have an e85 specific tune with regard to timing?
I'd be interested in seeing the tune if you're willing to share it
Ive done nothing other than occasionally showing up.Good job Team Mafoose and Team Fige
Just to toss somethings out there, e85 has a greater flame speed. On top of that, you need more of it.
Keeping the above in mind, do you have an e85 specific tune with regard to timing?
Ive done nothing other than occasionally showing up.
Not in low compression engines... it's funny that way... since it's so heat absorbing, it really needs a squeeze to work properly... When used in a low compression engine, and not enough of the introthermic breakdown processes has had the chance to occur, it burn's ****ing slow, as the (not compressed enough) gasses in front of the flame front suck much of the heat out of it, making it burn slow. That's why most flex fuel engines that has a compression ratio that is rubbish-gasoline friendly, needs ****loads of ignition advance when opperating on E85.
Isn't that the point of the higher octane fuel in general; to burn more slowly so you can add more advance (to a point.. mbt).
I always thought the point was that it was detonation resistant. I know that sounds circular, but perhaps I should ask if burn speed is a side effect of detonation resistance?