• Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
    You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here

    Thank you for being a part of our community!

451ft-lbs and 365Whp. Reached my 400hp goal

3rd gear dyno:-P

:lol:

in b4 bent rods :-P

I don't bend rods :-P ...
5156_10102315760953382_1641487683_n.jpg

1395382_10102317997840642_634267794_n.jpg

1395367_10102317677178252_1940460566_n.jpg
 
Just to toss somethings out there, e85 has a greater flame speed. On top of that, you need more of it.

Keeping the above in mind, do you have an e85 specific tune with regard to timing?

Not in low compression engines... it's funny that way... since it's so heat absorbing, it really needs a squeeze to work properly... When used in a low compression engine, and not enough of the introthermic breakdown processes has had the chance to occur, it burn's ****ing slow, as the (not compressed enough) gasses in front of the flame front suck much of the heat out of it, making it burn slow. That's why most flex fuel engines that has a compression ratio that is rubbish-gasoline friendly, needs ****loads of ignition advance when opperating on E85.
 
Not in low compression engines... it's funny that way... since it's so heat absorbing, it really needs a squeeze to work properly... When used in a low compression engine, and not enough of the introthermic breakdown processes has had the chance to occur, it burn's ****ing slow, as the (not compressed enough) gasses in front of the flame front suck much of the heat out of it, making it burn slow. That's why most flex fuel engines that has a compression ratio that is rubbish-gasoline friendly, needs ****loads of ignition advance when opperating on E85.

Good infoz mang! I was reading some other places talking about how particular it can be regarding ignition timing, but perhaps the real trickiness to it is CR?

However, and at the risk of sounding like Gale Banks, might some of the torque numbers be the result of a longer slower burn? So even as the piston is heading back down, you still have a burn process (un-spent charge) and expanding gasses?
 
Isn't that the point of the higher octane fuel in general; to burn more slowly so you can add more advance (to a point.. mbt).
 
Isn't that the point of the higher octane fuel in general; to burn more slowly so you can add more advance (to a point.. mbt).

I always thought the point was that it was detonation resistant. I know that sounds circular, but perhaps I should ask if burn speed is a side effect of detonation resistance? :e-shrug:
 
Back
Top